Built by people who sat the test
We started this after watching too many capable people fail a language test they could clearly pass. The English was never the problem - the format was. So we built the thing we wished we had: every task type, exam timing, and a score you can trust the moment you finish.
What we will not do
- No invented scores. Objective tasks are marked against the answer key. Speaking and writing are scored from measured signals, and we label which engine produced the number.
- No score guarantees. Anyone promising you a 79 is selling something. We show you the gap and the fastest route to close it.
- No silent renewals. Access blocks end on the day they end.
Measure, then teach
Advice without a measurement is just an opinion. Every piece of feedback on this platform points at a number we can show you.
Respect the clock
Most people lose marks to pacing, not vocabulary. Timers are on by default because untimed practice teaches the wrong habits.
One scale, everywhere
Practice, mock and report all use the same 10-90 mapping, so improvement in one place means the same thing in another.
Talk to a human
Question about a score you were given, a task type that behaved oddly, or which plan fits your exam date? Send it over.
Send us a message
Everything you submit here is stored so the team can pick it up.
What people say afterwards
“I had sat the test twice and kept landing on 71. The trait breakdown showed my writing form mark was zero every time because I was going over the word limit. Fixed that one habit and cleared 79.”
“The speaking analysis was the thing. Seeing that I was averaging 96 words a minute with four long pauses explained a fluency score I had been arguing with for months.”
“Re-order paragraphs used to be a coin flip for me. The adjacent-pair marking made it obvious that I was getting two out of four right and losing the rest to one bad guess at the opening.”